Techniques · Evasions

The slip and uppercut

Slip to the left and come up with the lead uppercut.

Its own training$4.393 runs, 6.6 h
Shared training it was part of$00 runs with other techniques

Where it stands

TechniqueTeacher keptIn the studentOwn runs
slip and uppercutslipup1-204.5M24 October 2026not yet3

The slip and uppercut is from my motion capture, Muay Thai 02, take_01, 20.75–22.30 s: slip to the left, then the lead uppercut. It was one of four evasion teachers started within a minute of each other on 25 October, each cloned from the student distill4 (work log).

The first, slipup1-204.5M, scored 8 of 8 at the gate. On video it was less convincing. It played my clip 1.42 times as fast on average and threw the uppercut about 0.5 s early, so the slip before it was squeezed out. The cause was the punch clock: built for punches, it lets the policy play a reference up to twice as fast and pays for reaching the target sooner. Only the jab is held to its natural pace. The gate doesn’t check timing, so a rushed move still scores.

I asked for the slip to move the head further to the side. The reference was widened to hold the head 25 cm out, and slipup2-196.6M learnt it by bending its trunk sideways 52°. It looked more like a football headbutt than a slip, and it failed. A rebuilt version of the reference, with the trunk kept straight, looked physically wrong to me and was never trained. I went back to my original capture.

slipup3 started from slipup1 on that original capture, with the target moved down to the chin (1.49 m; it had been at eye height, 1.61 m). Its machine ran for 2.18 hours, but the record has no outcome and no model was kept from it. slipup1 stays the teacher until a better one exists, and the slip and uppercut is not in the student. Next: the punch clock held to my capture’s pace for evasions, and a gate that measures timing and shape, not only the hit.

What I think, as a coach

On slipup1: “the uppercut still looks good, so keep that one”, “but actually even that one looks like a big uppercut [more] than a slip”.

On slipup2: it “looks more like a football headbutt, it just stays there … It should recover straight away, like a U shape, but the head should be looking straight. The head doesn’t tilt, therefore the torso doesn’t tilt”. And “the target should be where the chin is, not higher than that.”

When the edited references looked wrong: “Keep to my original reference, like the one from motion capture.”

Every attempt

Every run that trained it on its own, in order.

RunOutcomeMachinesHoursCost
slipup1-2026102524 October · slip and uppercut · kept slipup1-204.5M · Teachers: slips, rolls and the lean backKept12.2$1.48
slipup2-2026102525 October · slip and uppercut · Teachers: slips, rolls and the lean backFailed12.1$1.41
slipup3-2026102525 October · slip and uppercut · Teachers: slips, rolls and the lean backNot kept22.3$1.51
3 training runs46.6$4.39

How the models descend

Its own runs, each with an arrow from the run it started from; faded boxes are models from elsewhere it started from or learnt from. Tap a run for its details. The whole history is on the lineage page.

Model lineage: 4 runs, each an arrow from the run it started from, dashed from its teachers.TeachersStudents24 Oct25 Octdistill4slipup1slipup2slipup3
keptstudent (distilled)not kept, stopped or failedstarted fromlearnt from (teacher)Tap a run for its details. Scroll sideways for time.

The work logs